Merger failures:
What every finance director should know
But value is destroyed as often as created when two
companies come together.
Phil Dunmore PIPC
Director of Finance Online, February 2011
Mergers and acquisitions are up year on year, quarter
on quarter and month on month.
Looking ahead the trend remains positive, with financial
services, pharma, transport, media and IT to name but
a few sectors all expecting further consolidation this
year.
But value is destroyed as often as created when two
companies come together.
That’s a huge risk to throw into the corporate
mix, particularly during such uncertain economic times
so why would any finance director ever give the green
light?
The reason is that everyone believes that theirs will
be a successful venture. If the numbers are right, success
will surely follow? Well, not really. Putting together
‘the deal’ and executing it effectively,
even if the numbers look stellar, is only one of many
battles. Experience dictates this is not where the war
will be won or lost.
Success is about minimising the downstream risk and
this is about planning. The best planning follows a
basic route map and starts when the board first decides
it wants to wade in to M&A waters – what kind
of target is ideal? Is the motivation knocking out the
competition, filling in skills and product gaps, entering
new territories or acquiring technology? Or is the deal
opportunistic? Clarity of purpose now will make the
process infinitely more likely of success.
On identifying the target, a business together with
its advisors will start due diligence. Nothing is assumed
about the target, every detail is checked from a financial
and IT audit to staff contracts, corporate reputation,
buildings, leases, pipeline both near and far and a
skills audit of staff. This won’t be news to most
finance directors and finding the gremlins now will
save money later.
But there’s another sort of planning that is
often overlooked: planning how you’re team’s
actually going to bring the two entities together -
on time, on budget – ensuring the value is physically
realised, not just a remnant on the acquisition proposal
for shareholders to beat you with.
Once a deal is accepted, detailed plans for integration,
fully costed and resourced, must be drawn up. Ideally,
an experienced senior executive will be put in charge
to liaise across the two companies’ departments.
Without the right leadership it will be neigh on impossible
to motivate staff, drive through 30-day, 60-day, 90-day
and 180-day plans and prevent long and difficult delays
to integration that so often destroy value.
In successful projects, this person is often a consultant,
an independent, experienced decision maker whose only
vested interest is making the deal work. Their experience
will help smooth the way and their independence will
reassure staff, but whoever is in charge, they should
follow five basic principles of integration that will
heavily influence the outcome.
Keep a sharp eye on the performance of the main business
Sounds simple, but neglect here is so often the root
cause of integration failures, resulting in a fall business
as clients are neglected and defect to the competition.
Keep sales teams motivated and clients informed during
the process – and monitor KPIs closely be they
daily, weekly or monthly. If something appears to be
going wrong, address it immediately to get it back on
track.
Integration versus optimisation - no contest!
Integration must be the priority and should only be
eclipsed by KSoR (Keeping the Show on the Road) or mandatory
imposed change. This is not the time for fixing every
operational issue or pandering to internal pressures
to add functionality or structures but for finding ways
to take complexity (and change) out.
Do not strive for planning perfection... it will never
be achieved!
Aiming to create an integration plan that answers all
of the questions before the organisation moves into
execution will just result in delays and prolonged debate.
Events will occur that no matter how long you take in
planning you will never predict. The level of success
will come down to how the organisation navigates through
these points of pain.
Dedication
Single accountability and dedicated focus on delivering
integration
Whoever is in charge must be accountable and have direct
access to the board. Managing the delivery of a successful
integration (or any major change programme) is not a
part-time activity nor is it for the uninitiated. A
dedicated, experienced team will inject speed to decision
making and create the relentless focus on the end game.
Manage the market and communicate like mad!
The post-acquisition world is alive with uncertainty
for both the external market and the enlarged organisation.
This is the time to ‘up the ante’ on communications,
increasing the frequency of updates to clients; staff;
ensuring key third-parties are clear on their roles
in the integration process; and keeping the myriad of
interested by-standers including the media and city
analysts on your side. Across all of these groups, you
must constantly communicate the logic of the acquisition,
the integration plan and its progress. The importance
of this cannot be overstated!
Of course there is no ‘one size fits all’
model to integration but success is closely linked to
keeping sight of the above principles. When the one
in charge of the purse strings does so the chances of
unlocking the potential and creating value from the
deal is maximised. Give it the green light!
|