| |
|
Teaming with
outside partners to hit the target
Collaboration with external companies, including competitors,
can take many forms. Such relationships require agreeing
on the extent of the collaboration, defining shared
goals and a relationship built on trust
By Rod Newing
Financial Times, 8 November 2006
Blinded by the potential returns from a new idea or
business concept, organisations often rush headlong
into implementation before properly considering the
ramifications. Unfortunately, finding the right balance
between responding quickly and responding well is not
always easy, especially if you are collaborating with
a competitor.
“Collaboration is often driven by an entrepreneurial
idea that sprouts from a Eureka moment,” says
Matt Parkinson, chief operating officer at Catalysis
a consultancy. “Parties come together convinced
that they can deliver greater than the sum of their
parts. However, implementation requires a different
set of skills than the creative skills of the entrepreneur.
Even worse, the sponsoring entrepreneur often becomes
distracted by their next great idea.”
Everybody agrees that the single most important success
factor in collaborating is for all parties is to be
absolutely clear of not just the common objective, but
also each party’s individual objectives. Success
only follows if these objectives align into a win-win
situation for all parties.
“Managing any collaborative process is
very difficult because there are so many different points
of influence and potential upset,” says Simon
Rawling, global head of PIPC, a consultancy. “Managing
risk is essential and it has to be planned and executed
with genuine synergy and a common goal. Collaboration
should not be used to cut corners, get something on
the cheap or to deflect blame on to another business.”
Whereas these considerations are important when collaborating
with third parties, they become critical when working
with competitors. Common goals with competitors are
not hard to find, and include issues such as market
growth through standardisation, sharing of resources,
exchanging products, cross-selling to each others’
customers and joint research.
Edouard Croufer, head of the chemical and pharmaceutical
practice at Arthur D Little, a consultancy, points to
a number of alliances between innovative European pharmaceutical
companies that have difficulty entering the huge US
market. “They collaborate with global competitors
on a particular product for the life of the patent,”
he says. “It is a very efficient and economic
way to penetrate markets where they would have difficulties
on their own.”
Obviously, initiating talks with a major competitor
is not easy. Telecommunications company Orange has alliances
with several competitors, including the Freemove Alliance
with Telecom Italia Mobile and T-Mobile in Europe, and
with Cingular Wireless in the US. Although consumers
mainly want international roaming, multinational companies
want a deeper service, including a single point of contact,
streamlined contracting and volume discounts. Orange
and T-Mobile are fierce competitors in the UK and the
Netherlands, so there are strict rules in the Alliance
about confidentiality, competition and who leads on
business and who does not.
“The idea of the Freemove Alliance was initiated
at international level, which oversees individual countries,
to sort out the rules of engagement,” says Derek
Austin, European head of enterprise marketing at Orange
Business Services. “When dealing with competitors
you need to be very clear on your legal position and
the extent of the collaboration, in terms of particular
types of customers and particular types of product.
Be very clear on the areas you are talking about collaborating
in and the areas that are definitely excluded.”
Capgemini the consultancy, believes that it has achieved
good skills in working with others. For instance, on
its outsourcing contract with Her Majesty’s Revenue
& Customs, one of the world’s largest, 60
per cent of delivery is through third parties, including
natural competitors such as Accenture, BT and Fujitsu,
“On the face of it, giving revenue, market share
or references to our competitors seems a silly idea,”
says Martin Cook, Capgemini’s global sales officer,
who originally set up and managed the deal. “However,
there is a premium on being able to work with others
to better meet the strategic need of the client. Doing
so successfully is a fantastic reference.”
Obviously, the biggest issue when working with competitors
is establishing trust. Early meetings should be at a
high level and be aimed at setting out the overall guidelines
and boundaries. “Start to get to know each other
and proceed stepwise,” advises Mr Croufer. “Then
expand it to bring in experts later.”
Orange’s Mr Austin believes that trust comes from
solid agreement on what is acceptable and what is not.
The “rules of engagement” in countries where
you compete must be very strictly documented and enforced.
“We started cautiously, but trust built-up as
time passed and things were delivered and agreements
were maintained,” he says. “ People are
just as keen and focused now as they were three years
ago to make sure we don’t breach any of the agreements,
but there is a much easier atmosphere now.”
Mr Cook warns that there are many pitfalls that can
prevent a successful relationship being established,
such as: woolly objectives; trying to pick one player
off against another; being insufficiently transparent;
and deliberately not working to build up trust. In order
to succeed, he advises parties to: focus on their common
objectives; set up transparent operating procedures;
involve all partners in designing solutions; and give
them access to the information they need to do a good
job. “If you have in the back of your mind that
you would like them to fail, to show that you are better,
then it won’t work,” he says. “Above
everything else you have to be committed to their success.”
Collaborating with third parties is excellent for harnessing
different skills and exchanging ideas. Alex Shephard,
group account director at Space, a marketing agency,
points out that the output from collaborative thinking
is significantly greater, and potentially much more
powerful, than the sum of its parts. “Collaboration
allows smaller, typically younger, organisations to
gain a larger share of ‘voice’ than they
might otherwise enjoy,” he says. “The larger,
more traditional, agency leaders get to see a new way
of working, with the potential for reinvigorating a
potentially staid process and blinkered way of problem
solving. Individuals need to be open to casting aside
their usual ways of working and receptive to an unfamiliar
environment in which different does not have to mean
worse.”
Although all representatives must be able to contribute
on an equal footing, particularly during the initial
planning process, some parties will play a greater role
than others in implementation of individual elements.
“Be confident that you are at the table on merit
and be relaxed that your collaborators are there for
the same reason,” advises Mr Shephard. “They
are not a threat. Also, do not feel prevented from bringing
in an additional third party if specific competency
is required. This is an indication of maturity, not
inadequacy.”
As Catalyst’s Mr Parkinson puts it: “People
see the pound signs, but don’t always understand
one another’s priorities. With a typical success
rate of three in ten, the opportunity cost of the effort
that it takes to make a collaboration work should not
be overlooked. There is a strong correlation between
project success and failure and the time parties invest
upfront in agreeing ground rules and working practices.
Each party must know what success will look like to
the other parties.”
© Financial Times
|
|